Literature Review: Improving Lecturers Instructing Quality through Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation as HR Transformation for Indonesian Universities' Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52218/ijbtob.v2i5.206Abstract
The literature review in this article intends to address the theoretical needs in planning, implementing, and evaluating as the Transformation of Human Resources (HR) for the future of the university in order to improve the caliber of lecturers' teaching. Planning is necessary for effective teaching in order to keep instructors and college students on the same page. Applying the right technology raises the bar for curricular and instructional advice, development, and professional support at institutions. Implementing instruction is possible if lecturers and college students take an active part in the quality improvement process. In the interaction between teaching and learning that affects cognitive, constructivist, transformational, and behavioral theories in the university setting, lecturers play a significant role. The effectiveness of lecturers' instruction can also be assessed through training, research, and technology transfer. By providing information, instructional materials, and human resource development geared on developing college students' skills and capabilities, lecturers can enhance college students' talents and widen their horizons. In this perspective, education is viewed as a technological process and as a product that can be packaged and applied to assess the effectiveness of instruction. Big Data and the Internet of Things (IoT) are two examples of artificial intelligence technologies that could be the focus of future trends in the use of learning assistance software. This solution not only increases available space and learning opportunities for college students while also enhancing the quality of their education, but it also assists lecturers in utilizing digitization to their advantage in the future of higher education.
Downloads
References
Bell, M., Cooper, P. (2013). Peer observation of teaching in university departments: A framework for implementation. International Journal for Academic Development, Crossref, 18(1), pp. 60–73.
Brown J., Kurzweil M. (2017). Instructional Quality, Student Outcomes, and Institutional Finances. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Casnan, Purnawan, Firmansyah I., Triwahyuni H. (2022). Evaluasi Proses Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan Systems Thinking. Scholaria Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 12(1),31-38
Diana, T. J. (2013). Developing reflective teachers with the research-based rationale. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 49, 26–29.
Fahmi I., Gaffar M. F., Permana J., Harawan E. (2020). Peningkatan Mutu Dosen Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Di Universitas. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan 27 (2), 228-239.
Feistauer D, Richter T (2017). How Reliable Are Students’ Evaluations Of Teaching Quality? A Variance Components Approach. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 42(8).
Fischer J., Anna Khatarina P., Eckhard. K (2019). The Impact Of Linguistic Similarity On Cross-Cultural Comparability Of Students’ Perceptions Of Teaching Quality. Educational Assessment, Evaluation And Accountability, pp. 1-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11092-019-09295-7
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, Crossref PubMed, 111(23), pp. 8410–8415.
Giraleas D. (2019). Can We Assess Teaching Quality on the Basis of Student Outcomes? A Stochastic Frontier Application. Studies in Higher Education.
Hutasuhut J., Syamsuri A. R, Saragih A, Ovami D. B. (2021). Etika Kerja Islam dan Relevansinya terhadap Kinerja Dosen (Studi pada Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian. Kerja sama Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah dengan Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 162-172
Ismail S. N, Kanesan A. G, Muhammad F. (2018). Teacher Collaboration as a Mediator for Strategic Leadership and Teaching Quality. International Journal of Instruction, 11 (4).
Jordens J. Z. (2019). An Exploration of Science Lecturers' Views on Quality Teaching in Science at University. A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C. (2016). Student characteristics and learning outcomes in a blended learning environment intervention in a Ugandan University. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), pp. 181–195.
Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Van de Grift, W. (2015). Development and evaluation of a questionnaire measuring pre-service teachers’ teaching behaviour: A Rasch modelling approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Crossref, 26(2), pp. 169–194. Crossref
Moila O., Mji A., Mnisi S. S (2020). Challenges faced by lecturers in the use of fourth industrial revolution tools to equip pre-service teachers in a South African university. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education (WIETE), 18(3), pp. 350-354
Mujahidin A., Zuhriah F., Khoirianingrum I. (2018). Pengaruh Citra Perguruan Tinggi dan Kompetensi Dosen terhadap Loyalitas Mahasiswa melalui Kepuasan Mahasiswa pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta (Studi pada IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro). Jurnal Al-Tijaroh, 4(2), 49-66. http://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/altijarah
Nguyen D. T., Chung K. T. (2020). New Trends In Technology Application In Education and Capacities of Universities Lecturers During the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD), 10(3), pp. 1709-1714.
Ruslim N. M., Ee N. L., Saharun N.,, Baharuddin N., Bakar N. A. A.,Karim M. K. A (2020). The Correlation between Teaching Evaluation and Lecturers’ Performances. Asian Social Science and Humanities Research Journal (ASHREJ), 2(1), pp. 32-37.
Sadler, R. (2012). The challenges for new academics to adopting student-centred approaches to teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 37(6), 731–745. Crossref
Schneider, M., Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. Crossref PubMed.
Soraya N. (2018). Analisis Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Kompetensi Dosen dalam Mengajar pada Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam, Fakultas, Ilmu Tarbiayah dan Ilmu Keguruan UIN Raden Fatah Palembang. Tadrib Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 4(1), 184-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/Tadrib.v4i1.1957
Suib, M. (2011). Kebijakan dan Pengembangan Mutu Dosen. Jurnal Cakrawala Kependidikan, Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak, 9 (2)
Sumartono I., Santoso H. B. (2019). Analisis Perancangan Sistem Rencana Pembelajaran Terpadu dalam Mendukung Efektivitas dan Mutu Pengajaran Dosen (Studi kasus: Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi). Jurnal Teknik Dan Informatika, 6(1).
Syamsuri A. R., Dalimunthe R. F., Gultom P., Siahaan E. (2022). New Paradigm: HR Professional Transformation in Manufacturing Company. Quality Acces to Succes-General Management, 23(186), pp. 123-133. doi: 10.47750/QAS/23.186.16
Thommen D., Sieber V., Grob U., Anna Khatarina P. (2021). Teacher’s Motivational Profiles and Their Longitudinal Associations With Teaching Quality. Journal Learning And Instruction, Published: Elsevier, pp. 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101514
Trung N. S., Tuan T. Q., Huyen D. T. T., Ngan Ha T. T, Tuyen H. T. M., Loan, N T. T (2021). Factors Affecting the Quality of University Lecturers - A Research Conducted Within the Context of Vietnam Society. Higher Education Research, 6(3), pp. 58-62. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20210603.11
Yuan T. (2021). Algorithm of Classroom Teaching Quality Evaluation Based on Markov Chain. Journal Complexity. Published: Wiley, pp. 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9943865
